Adaptation and Obedience

Milgram: Theme and Variations

Morality is often understood as a “natural” brake on evil. In social reality, however, the situation is frequently exactly the opposite. Also the opposite than experts in psychiatry and psychology imagine. Morality, in connection with authority and shifting responsibility, can favour evil.


Stanely Milgram’s 23 variations of the basic test were designed to try to isolate the factors that most effectively convert morality into obedience. We look at 6 of these in more detail.

Bibliography

  • Burger, J. M. (2011). Obedience to Authority. In The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. American Cancer Society.
  • Burger, J. M., Girgis, Z. M., & Manning, C. C. (2011). In Their Own Words: Explaining Obedience to Authority Through an Examination of Participants’ Comments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 460–466.
  • Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Perry, G. (2014). Meta-Milgram: An Empirical Synthesis of the Obedience Experiments. PLOS ONE, 9(4).
  • Kaposi, D. (2017). The resistance experiments: Morality, authority and obedience in Stanley Milgram’s account. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(4), 382–401.
  • Lepage, J., Bègue, L., Zerhouni, O., Courset, R., & Mermillod, M. (2019). Influence of authoritarianism, vagal tone and mental fatigue on obedience to authority. Cognition and Emotion, 33(2), 157–172.
  • Milgram, S. (1974). The Dilemma of Obedience. The Phi Delta Kappan, 55(9), 603–606.
  • Milgram, S. (2009). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.